R2d2me2
Dec 30, 09:04 PM
Why dont you just downgrade to 3.xx. I switched to 4.0 and immediately switched back down to 3.xx when I saw the crappy performance . . .
That option is prob. better tahn switching to blackberry . . . The new blackberrys are prob. on par w/ the old iphone 3g . . .
my 3G iphone is now officially a POS (piece of ****). I rely heavily on my phone for business. I swap from email to text to phone frequently. I do about 3000 mins a month. My phone was fine with 3.0 software, ever since the upgrade to 4.0 (and now to 4.2.1). My iphoney is about to get replaced. It takes 4-5 secs for to switch to texts, about 4-5 secs to switch to email, when dialing a phone number it hesitates and often you end up with dialing the wrong number because it doubled up a number. Today my safari window locked up, I can't switch between open safari windows, its completely locked.
I will not be upgrading to iphoney 4, screw u apple, I am so pissed off that you would pull a stunt like this, I expected that from the other guys, not you.
Blackberry here I come!
That option is prob. better tahn switching to blackberry . . . The new blackberrys are prob. on par w/ the old iphone 3g . . .
my 3G iphone is now officially a POS (piece of ****). I rely heavily on my phone for business. I swap from email to text to phone frequently. I do about 3000 mins a month. My phone was fine with 3.0 software, ever since the upgrade to 4.0 (and now to 4.2.1). My iphoney is about to get replaced. It takes 4-5 secs for to switch to texts, about 4-5 secs to switch to email, when dialing a phone number it hesitates and often you end up with dialing the wrong number because it doubled up a number. Today my safari window locked up, I can't switch between open safari windows, its completely locked.
I will not be upgrading to iphoney 4, screw u apple, I am so pissed off that you would pull a stunt like this, I expected that from the other guys, not you.
Blackberry here I come!
macaddict23
Mar 31, 06:39 PM
Using an HD video camera, I'm trying to record a live presentation of a person standing next to an HDTV. In the viewfinder of the video camera, the speaker's fleshtones are fine, but everything on the TV screen has a blue cast. Any idea what's causing this, and how to fix it?
ipalove
Dec 22, 09:19 AM
Have you try to search for it in Amazon/ebay? there are actually a lot of types of external batteries out there which you can grab at great price.
Below article can probably be handy for you...
http://theipadfreak.org/2010/08/04/18-amazing-external-ipad-batteries-and-chargers-for-you-to-love/
;)
Below article can probably be handy for you...
http://theipadfreak.org/2010/08/04/18-amazing-external-ipad-batteries-and-chargers-for-you-to-love/
;)
TheStrudel
Apr 30, 10:50 PM
If you have to ask...you need to do some more basic research to understand lens construction and design.
Or to phrase another way: if you have to ask why it's so expensive, they're not trying to sell it to you.
But why would you want to get a lens that outresolves the camera sensor? Canon, Nikon and others already sell lenses that outresolve their sensors.
Or to phrase another way: if you have to ask why it's so expensive, they're not trying to sell it to you.
But why would you want to get a lens that outresolves the camera sensor? Canon, Nikon and others already sell lenses that outresolve their sensors.
BlizzardBomb
Jul 22, 06:40 AM
You shouldn't be worried about messing up the syntax. Regulars can sort that out if needed and you can preview your changes, so as long as the information is there, it should be fine. Even if you make a really bad edit, it can all be reverted if it needs to. Check this out (http://guides.macrumors.com/Help:How_to_Edit_a_Page) if you're interested in editing it yourself. Otherwise, thanks for pointing the page out.
Ommid
Apr 23, 04:05 AM
ZDNet Clock (http://www.zdnet.de/apple_systemeigenschaften_zdnet_clock_download-39002345-90565-1.htm) and you got yourself a 3.2GHz 8-core (or faster) for free
wouldn't do it anyway! Haha
wouldn't do it anyway! Haha
vintageapple
Mar 27, 01:39 AM
Hey guys, again I have too much junk laying around. Are these still worth anything? The boxes are all unopened, I have a bunch of boxes unopened similar to those, mostly ram and cables and stuff. Does anyone know if people buy this stuff? Or only 80's stuff is collectible? Thanks for any help!
http://img708.imageshack.us/img708/6641/screenshot20110326at112.pnghttp://img823.imageshack.us/img823/5011/screenshot20110326at112l.pnghttp://img9.imageshack.us/img9/508/screenshot20110326at111.png
http://img708.imageshack.us/img708/6641/screenshot20110326at112.pnghttp://img823.imageshack.us/img823/5011/screenshot20110326at112l.pnghttp://img9.imageshack.us/img9/508/screenshot20110326at111.png
chown33
Apr 15, 12:53 PM
Email isn't sent "to your smartphone". It's sent to your email account. If you check it using your smartphone, that's not something the sender of the email has any control over.
What is your experience level in working with sensor networks, devices, etc.? What is your programming experience?
It sounds like you want a home automation system integrated with a computerized home security system. Some systems will do both, but not always, so you have to shop sensibly.
Starting from nothing at all, you should expect to spend at least a few hundred dollars to get started. If you already have something installed, such as sensors or controlled outlets or devices, the cost may be less. It depends on how well what you have can connect to the overall system architecture.
What is your experience level in working with sensor networks, devices, etc.? What is your programming experience?
It sounds like you want a home automation system integrated with a computerized home security system. Some systems will do both, but not always, so you have to shop sensibly.
Starting from nothing at all, you should expect to spend at least a few hundred dollars to get started. If you already have something installed, such as sensors or controlled outlets or devices, the cost may be less. It depends on how well what you have can connect to the overall system architecture.
omar701
Apr 2, 07:25 PM
Hi,
Before anything..this is my first post. Hi and thank you to everyone that reads.
I`m having a problem with iWeb SEO Tool with one of my sites ( the one that is published via FTP, the other ones are in process, not yet publish). I publish it to a folder, with the purpouse of editing title tag and adding google apps etc, and the publish it via SEO tool. When i look for the publishing folder in my desktop and try to open it with the SEO tool the software crashes.
To see if it was the software i try opening one of my other pages that in not yet published on a FTP and it worked fine.
When i look for the site`s file and open one by one of the files that it let me open inside the publishing file it works but it seem that is managing mi site`s files as independent sites (a world simbols appear besides each site`s page).
If there is something you can do for me let me know please.
Thanks in advance.
Before anything..this is my first post. Hi and thank you to everyone that reads.
I`m having a problem with iWeb SEO Tool with one of my sites ( the one that is published via FTP, the other ones are in process, not yet publish). I publish it to a folder, with the purpouse of editing title tag and adding google apps etc, and the publish it via SEO tool. When i look for the publishing folder in my desktop and try to open it with the SEO tool the software crashes.
To see if it was the software i try opening one of my other pages that in not yet published on a FTP and it worked fine.
When i look for the site`s file and open one by one of the files that it let me open inside the publishing file it works but it seem that is managing mi site`s files as independent sites (a world simbols appear besides each site`s page).
If there is something you can do for me let me know please.
Thanks in advance.
iGary
Nov 4, 02:10 PM
Have to figure out how to make this work, too:
http://www.garyianreich.com/mike/aerial/aerial.html
http://www.garyianreich.com/mike/aerial/aerial.html
wormtail
Jan 18, 09:32 AM
Thanks a lot mate :)
portent
Dec 6, 04:03 PM
It's logical enough that Intel was considered as an alternative before Apple adopted the G5. Apple has admitted that an x86 version of Mac OS X has been maintained internally since day one.
sw1tcher
Sep 17, 01:12 AM
i know i am going out really far on this one...but my friend says she has a friend that works at the local apple store who hooked her up when she bought her 15" powerbook a few months ago. she couldn't give me any specifics, but i want to see her reciept to see what kind of discount she got. however, i probably won't get to see it for a few more days.
i am wondering if anyone knows anything about the apple employee discounts? from my research, any apple employee can receive 1 25% discount, and 3 15% discounts during a 1 year time period.
my big question is...can these be combined with education discounts?
thx!
Short answer: NO
i am wondering if anyone knows anything about the apple employee discounts? from my research, any apple employee can receive 1 25% discount, and 3 15% discounts during a 1 year time period.
my big question is...can these be combined with education discounts?
thx!
Short answer: NO
Digital Hybrid
Aug 13, 01:12 PM
Genius! Definitely a potential winner!
/me likes
/me likes
clayj
Sep 27, 11:02 AM
That does happen from time to time... back in the '80s or early '90s, there was a rather famous incident where a couple of newscasters were bitching about Japan on the air... no one realized it was actually being broadcast, but they got a BUNCH of complaints from the Japanese about it.
And let's not forget Ronald Reagan's famous "the bombing starts in five minutes" radio broadcast. (Personally, I've always thought that one was done "accidentally on purpose".)
And let's not forget Ronald Reagan's famous "the bombing starts in five minutes" radio broadcast. (Personally, I've always thought that one was done "accidentally on purpose".)
chadolson11
Mar 7, 12:17 PM
Me and a buddy are planning to be there around noon. Getting black 16GB wifi models. And it'll give us 5 hours to decided which color cover to get.
Huntn
Feb 28, 07:56 AM
In 1961, 50 years ago, President Dwight D. Eisenhower, a Republican and man who was deeply involved in the favorable outcome of WWII warned the Nation of the rise of the "Military-Industrial Complex" in his farewell address.
This is a fantastic article, The Tyranny of Defense, Inc (http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/01/the-tyranny-of-defense-inc/8342/), if you would like something to ponder about the history of the U.S.. No, it was not all our fault. The Soviet Union was there egging us on in the beginning. But today the War Machine is alive and well. The cost of the Iraq/Afganistan war is at least $1 Trillion. Some observes believe the cost could reach 2 or 3 trillion dollars. Should we bankrupt ourselves for the benefit of big business? By defeating Iraq and struggling in Afganistan have we increased our security in the big scheme of things as compared to the stress on our economy? I'm doubtful.
Largely overlooked by most commentators was a second theme that Eisenhower had woven into his text. The essence of this theme was simplicity itself: spending on arms and armies is inherently undesirable. Even when seemingly necessary, it constitutes a misappropriation of scarce resources. By diverting social capital from productive to destructive purposes, war and the preparation for war deplete, rather than enhance, a nation’s strength. And while assertions of military necessity might camouflage the costs entailed, they can never negate them altogether.
“Every gun that is made,” Eisenhower told his listeners, “every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.” Any nation that pours its treasure into the purchase of armaments is spending more than mere money. “It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children.” To emphasize the point, Eisenhower offered specifics:
The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities … We pay for a single fighter with a half million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people.
When President Obama was first elected he asked his generals what are his options in Afghanistan. He was only given one choice, the surge. According to Bob Woodward, Obama complained, "What's my options? You've only given me one option."
The article's conclusion is that funding the Military-Industrial Complex does not benefit average Americans, in fact hurts them. I'll add that the MIC has the full backing of the Republican Party.
Furthermore, military Keynesianism has proved to be a bust. In contrast to the 1950s, military extravagance is depleting rather than adding to the nation’s wealth. In the Eisenhower era, the United States, a creditor nation, produced at home the essentials defining the American way of life—everything from oil to cars to televisions. Today, we import far more than we export, with ever-increasing debt as one result. Furthermore, in the 1950s, we were mostly at peace; today we are mostly at war—and, as a result, more of the resources provided to the military go abroad and stay there.
the grandchildren of Ozzie and Harriet, coping with 9.8 percent unemployment and contemplating the implications of trillion-dollar deficits, see little benefit from our exorbitant Pentagon outlays. If paying Pashtun drivers to truck fuel from Pakistan into Afghanistan is producing any positive economic side effects, the American worker is not among the beneficiaries.
This is a fantastic article, The Tyranny of Defense, Inc (http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/01/the-tyranny-of-defense-inc/8342/), if you would like something to ponder about the history of the U.S.. No, it was not all our fault. The Soviet Union was there egging us on in the beginning. But today the War Machine is alive and well. The cost of the Iraq/Afganistan war is at least $1 Trillion. Some observes believe the cost could reach 2 or 3 trillion dollars. Should we bankrupt ourselves for the benefit of big business? By defeating Iraq and struggling in Afganistan have we increased our security in the big scheme of things as compared to the stress on our economy? I'm doubtful.
Largely overlooked by most commentators was a second theme that Eisenhower had woven into his text. The essence of this theme was simplicity itself: spending on arms and armies is inherently undesirable. Even when seemingly necessary, it constitutes a misappropriation of scarce resources. By diverting social capital from productive to destructive purposes, war and the preparation for war deplete, rather than enhance, a nation’s strength. And while assertions of military necessity might camouflage the costs entailed, they can never negate them altogether.
“Every gun that is made,” Eisenhower told his listeners, “every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.” Any nation that pours its treasure into the purchase of armaments is spending more than mere money. “It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children.” To emphasize the point, Eisenhower offered specifics:
The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities … We pay for a single fighter with a half million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people.
When President Obama was first elected he asked his generals what are his options in Afghanistan. He was only given one choice, the surge. According to Bob Woodward, Obama complained, "What's my options? You've only given me one option."
The article's conclusion is that funding the Military-Industrial Complex does not benefit average Americans, in fact hurts them. I'll add that the MIC has the full backing of the Republican Party.
Furthermore, military Keynesianism has proved to be a bust. In contrast to the 1950s, military extravagance is depleting rather than adding to the nation’s wealth. In the Eisenhower era, the United States, a creditor nation, produced at home the essentials defining the American way of life—everything from oil to cars to televisions. Today, we import far more than we export, with ever-increasing debt as one result. Furthermore, in the 1950s, we were mostly at peace; today we are mostly at war—and, as a result, more of the resources provided to the military go abroad and stay there.
the grandchildren of Ozzie and Harriet, coping with 9.8 percent unemployment and contemplating the implications of trillion-dollar deficits, see little benefit from our exorbitant Pentagon outlays. If paying Pashtun drivers to truck fuel from Pakistan into Afghanistan is producing any positive economic side effects, the American worker is not among the beneficiaries.
italiano40
Jun 22, 02:23 PM
Can we get pics
harpster
Mar 20, 11:27 AM
If you are having problems with referencing the path to your include file you can do something like this.
synagence
Mar 25, 02:51 PM
To wrap up...
People were joining the queue at 5pm still, stocks were extremely limited by that point and only a handful of specific models remained.
Overall the queue was well over 200 growing steadily all afternoon.
Staff were great, chatty and friendly and dishing out StarBucks coffee and bottled water all afternoon
Here a quick video of the moment of the curtain drop which i saw thanks to a timely reshuffle of the queue
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UT0-RKR0wF8&hd=1
I was 80th in line and managed to get everything i wanted and was out of the store and on my way home by about 5:45pm
Fairly well organised and would definitely consider going there again for a launch
People were joining the queue at 5pm still, stocks were extremely limited by that point and only a handful of specific models remained.
Overall the queue was well over 200 growing steadily all afternoon.
Staff were great, chatty and friendly and dishing out StarBucks coffee and bottled water all afternoon
Here a quick video of the moment of the curtain drop which i saw thanks to a timely reshuffle of the queue
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UT0-RKR0wF8&hd=1
I was 80th in line and managed to get everything i wanted and was out of the store and on my way home by about 5:45pm
Fairly well organised and would definitely consider going there again for a launch
Xtremehkr
Sep 16, 09:51 PM
Give me a few minutes, the headline let me to believe that you had already decided. Now I find out that it is a thread about which inexpensive card you should get. I am so confused.
Which one are you favoring?
Which one are you favoring?
Sun Baked
Sep 22, 08:25 PM
Nope, stuck with Apple ...
And if you look at the www.970eval.com website, the G5 is insanely complex to use -- which killed the white box market and it's use in embedded systems.
Basically it's Apple or nothing -- in fact some of the companies that signed contracts to build machines using the G5 exited the business entirely :p .
Edit: with the G3 and G4, you didn't need to use any parts from Apple to build a PPC system -- but you cannot get away from it on the G5.
And if you look at the www.970eval.com website, the G5 is insanely complex to use -- which killed the white box market and it's use in embedded systems.
Basically it's Apple or nothing -- in fact some of the companies that signed contracts to build machines using the G5 exited the business entirely :p .
Edit: with the G3 and G4, you didn't need to use any parts from Apple to build a PPC system -- but you cannot get away from it on the G5.
Floris
Dec 18, 10:23 AM
http://smashingmagazine.com/
http://www.w3schools.com/
http://psdfan.com/
http://net.tutsplus.com/ (also has graphic stuff)
http://mycoffeecupisempty.com/
http://www.w3schools.com/
http://psdfan.com/
http://net.tutsplus.com/ (also has graphic stuff)
http://mycoffeecupisempty.com/
wako
Jun 25, 11:51 PM
sooo... i told someone else to take the pictures for me, and unfortunately they suck at that. Ill take better pictures tomorrow...
goto web.mac.com/c.h.lee to see them
btw, jersey does have first dibs on it. but if something falls through ill goto the next person. so keep sending me offers.
goto web.mac.com/c.h.lee to see them
btw, jersey does have first dibs on it. but if something falls through ill goto the next person. so keep sending me offers.
